Monday, November 7, 2011

Opinion: World Community Ignoring Refugees In Algeria

Joseph K. Grieboski, founder of the Institute of Religion and Public Policy, writes that the international community has forgotten the plight faced by refugees in Algerian and Polisario-run camps. However, with the recent kidnappings of Spanish aid-workers, the world is now showing concern for the situation in these camps. Grieboski points out that Algeria, in which the camps are located, has been silent regarding the kidnappings and must address the kidnappings and the Western Sahara issue at-large. Read More

Question of the Day: What more can be done to bring light upon the situation in the refugee Camps?


Leave your comments below to be heard!

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Morocco Dealing With Lone-Wolf Terrorism

Morocco’s counter-terrorism measures have made it difficult for Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) to gain a foothold in the country. However, Morocco continues to suffer from lone-wolf operators who operate outside the structure of the larger terrorist network. Though the Algerian-backed Polisario and AQIM are unlikely to work together because of Algeria’s opposition to Al-Qaida, Morocco’s primary source of trouble may be the Western Sahara.  Analysts warn that its inhabitants’ anger with the Moroccan government may lead to youth being drawn to violence. Read More

Question of the Day: What can Morocco do to prevent Western Sahara from becoming a source of trouble?

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Sentences Handed Out for Soccer Riots

Eleven people were convicted for their role in riots that killed seven people during a soccer game. The riot occurred in the Western Saharan city of Dakhla, after rival groups, which reportedly also included Sahrawi activists, and left two policeman among the dead. The sentences have ranged from eight months to a year. Read More

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Morocco Reaffirms Committment to Finding Western Sahara Solution

UN News Centre
Moroccan Foriegn Minister Taïb Fassi Fihri told the UN Tuesday that his nation was ready to intensify negotiations in order to resolve the Western Sahara conflict. Fihri underscored the importance of finding a solution in light of the Arab Spring. In addition, Fihri stated that Morocco had been working hard to increase contacts with Algeria in order to improve relations between the two countries. Read More

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Fatalities After Western Sahara Soccer Game

Seven people, two of which were policeman, were killed after a soccer game in the city of Dakhla, Western Sahara on Sunday. Initial reports show that along with multiple stores being torched, at least 20 people were injured.  The interior minister of Morocco ordered an investigation into the incident. Read More

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

US Anaylsts: Polisario Increasing Drug Trade Efforts


According to US analysts, the Polisario has expanded its drug trafficking efforts in Northern Africa. This has led to the Polisario dividing into warring divisions, with the last month seeing opposing Polisario factions fighting on the Mali-Algeria border. One analyst stated that the Polisario, an Algerian-supported Western Sahara group, has teamed up with Al Qaida in the drug and weapons trade. Read More

New "Morocco Caucus" Formed in Congress

Leaders of Congress unveiled the formation of a "Congressional Morocco Caucus" last week. The bipartisan group is tasked with "deepening the economic and strategic relationship between the United States and Morocco". A letter sent from the group to fellow House members highlighted the importance of Morocco's alliance and praised Morocco's recent constitutional referendum in response to the Arab Spring. Members also worried that the continuing dispute in the Western Sahara was distracting from issues such as anti-terrorism and dealing with the regional unrest. Read More

Question of the Day: Does the formation of the Caucus represent a step-forward on the Western Sahara issue that will produce actual results?

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

The Autonomy Plan- For the Win

It’s a question that hounds people around the world: how do you reconcile the legitimate territorial rights of a sovereign nation to the equally legitimate aspirations of a local populace to self-determination? At first glance, these ideas may seem very much mutually exclusive. However, King Muhammad VI of Morocco may just have created a solution that satisfies both principles.

The area of conflict is the Western Sahara, which has lived essentially in limbo since the departure of its Spanish colonial overlord in 1975. Authority passed to joint rule by Morocco and Mauretania. Violence soon broke out though, and in the late 1970’s the Mauritanian government threw in the towel and gave up any claims in favor of the POLISARIO rebels. Morocco stayed though, backed by internationally recognized land claims that went back, depending on who was asked, at least decades.

On the other hand, there are of course people who live in the Western Sahara. These people, by any and all standards, deserve proper government and basic civil liberties. The UN recognizes this fact, but more importantly the Moroccan government recognizes this. This led King Muhammad VI, after the failure of numerous rounds of talks with the POLISARIO front, to take the initiative and create his own autonomy plan. It is a plan that Secretary of State Hilary Clinton called, “serious, realistic and credible, a potential approach to satisfy the aspirations of the people in the Western Sahara to run their own affairs in peace and dignity.”

The autonomy plan is effective in reconciling the two outlying causes of the conflict over the Western Sahara. It recognizes Morocco’s sovereignty over the Western Sahara, while allowing for serious local governance by the people of the region. It is a credible plan, and, as constitutional law professor Benoit Pelletier of Ottawa University said, “in conformity with international norms in force.”

Such an approach, as balanced as it is, is simply in line with the reforms and progress King Muhammad VI has made since his ascension to the throne 12 years ago.

The American Task Force on Western Sahara sees this as a truly viable solution to the conflict, which is why ATFWS so heartily supports it. The autonomy plan is a reasonable way to end one conflict on a conflict-plagued continent.

What do you think? Is it a framework for peace or a farce? Join the debate!

-By the Editors

Monday, September 5, 2011

Deadly Unexploded Munitions Destroyed in Western Sahara

August saw over 7,000 Unexploded Ordinances (grenades, artillery projectiles, and bombs) destroyed in the Western Sahara. Though the exact number of these live munitions, which are spread all across the Western Sahara, is unknown, there have been thousands of casualties that have resulted due to civilians coming upon these explosives. MINURSO conducted the destruction of the munitions across 433 sites across the Western Sahara. Read More

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Polisario Fighters Captured in Libya

An official in the National Transitional Council (NTC), Libya's official rebel organization, announced that over 550 fighters from the Polisario Front were detained near the town of Zawiyah.. The official stated that documents from recovered from the Algerian Embassy in Tripoli show that the fighters entered Libya with support of Algiers. The fighters, fighting as mercenaries for Moammar Ghadaffi, were also supported by some Algerian troops, the official claimed. Read More

Question of the Day: If substantiated, why would the Polisario agree to fight for Ghadaffi?

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Chilean Senate President Comments on Western Sahara Conflict

During a visit to Rabat to discuss common legislative interests between the two countries, the President of Chile's Senate, Guido Gilardi, called Morocco's autonomy plan "interesting". Gilardi expressed Chile's support for the United Nations to resolve the long-standing Western Sahara conflict. In addition, he praised Morocco's recent democratic initiatives. Read More

QUESTION OF THE DAY: How do you interpret the Senate President's statements on the conflict?

Leave your comments below to have your view heard.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Absurd Standards

Aida Alami, in her New York Times piece “Morocco's Democratic Changes Fail to Appease All”, critiques Morocco’s recent constitutional referendums. Alami points out that critics have viewed the referendum as inadequate, the process as invalid, and the constitutional changes as cosmetic. However, there are a few points that Alami does not take into account in coming to her conclusions.

Firstly, the article fails to realize that Morocco is in a region that is, by all accounts, behind in a democratic institutions. To expect it to change overnight into a constitutional monarchy or some other type of representative government is unrealistic. These processes take time to develop. It took the United States 88 years after its founding to deem that slavery of another individual as illegal. No one, not even Morocco itself, believes that this constitutional referendum fully solves the lack of representative government. The King himself stated in his address to the nation that the new constitution is no silver bullet, saying, “As perfect as it may be, a constitution is never an end in itself, but rather a means for the establishment of democratic institutions.” Put into perspective of the entire Middle East, however, this is an unprecedented step forward. While other regimes have either ignored protestor’s demands, given vague promises, or clamped down on protestors, Morocco has actually introduced a set of reforms and presented it to the people. This will not only have implications within Morocco itself (and the Western Sahara conflict), but also across the broader region. There is admittedly much work to be done, but this is a response to citizens’ demands which should be applauded.

The article states that only 13 million out of the 20 million citizens eligible to vote were actually registered to vote. That comes out to 65% of those able to vote were actually registered. This is not far behind the United States, where the percentage is 71%. Once again, considering the Arab world is just coming into the democratic era, this is a promising number. Also, of those who did vote, 98% voted in favor of the referendum. Of course, this is not “all”, but it is at least indicative of a large number of Moroccans accepting the reforms.
The title of the article itself reveals another flaw in its expectations. The title states that not “all” are happy with the changes. Is this not an obvious statement? No matter what was proposed, would everyone be happy? Such is the nature of a society- there will be some that are happy with certain courses of action, others who would have liked to go a different route. Once again, the United States is an apt example. The current debt ceiling negotiations are guaranteed to not appease somebody. Even on less contentious issues, there is never a 100% appeasement rate. It is not fair to keep such a high standard on such policy initiatives.

Morocco is not “there” yet. Its internal situation, and its issues with Western Sahara, are ever evolving. While it is important for those on the outside to encourage reforms and progress, it is equally imperative that expectations be realistic. It is vital that the context of the region’s history and politics be taken into account when judging the pace of change.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

UN-led Western Sahara Talks Resume Today

After a month-long hiatus, the United Nations has backed another round of informal talks concerning the Western Sahara conflict. Along with  Morocco and the Polisario Front, the talks will include the countries of Mauritania and Algeria. The talks are slated to begin today and end this Thursday.

The talks come at the invitation of Christopher Ross, Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara, continuing an effort since 1976 to negotiate a settlement.

Question of the Day: Do you feel any progress will be made in these talks?

Leave your comments below.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

A Year and A Half Since Senators Expressed Support for Moroccan Autonomy Plan

A year and a half since 54 US Senators sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asking her to make the resolution of the Western Sahara conflict a top North African priority, the conflict still ensues. The letter pointed out that the region's struggling economy plus the restless youth population were contributing to instability. The Senators supported the autonomy plan, calling it "serious and credible".

Do you feel Congress has put siginificant attention towards the issue a year and a half later?
 
Leave your comments in the comment section to have your view heard.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

A Historical Speech by HM the King of Morocco - June 17th, 2011

HM The King of Morocco
                                                           
"Praise be to God. May peace and blessings be upon the Prophet, His Kith and Kin
My loyal subjects,
I am addressing you today to renew our joint commitment through a new Constitution, which represents a watershed event in the process of completing the construction of a State based on the rule of law and on democratic institutions, and to firmly establish the principles and mechanisms of good governance, provide for dignified citizenship and ensure social justice.
This is the ambitious project I set out to achieve since my accession to the Throne, in close conjunction with the nation’s stakeholders. Thanks to this approach we have managed, three months after having launched a constitutional revision process, to develop a new democratic constitutional charter based on the frame of reference set out in my historical speech delivered on 9 March 2011, which received unanimous national support. It is also based on the appropriate suggestions made by political parties and trade unions, community groups and youth organizations, as well as the creative work of the Advisory Committee, in addition to the constructive efforts of the Political Mechanism, both of which have been set up for this purpose.
I should like to commend the democratic contribution of all the parties and stakeholders involved. Through this participatory approach, we have managed to overhaul the current Constitution and develop a new constitutional text. The latter has unique characteristics relating to three aspects: methodology, format and content.
As regards methodology, I wanted to make sure - and this is a first in the history of our country - that the new Constitution is drawn up by Moroccans, for all Moroccans.
As for format, it is based on a new layout that concerns all its chapters, from the preamble - which is an integral part of the Constitution - to the very last article. The new text is thus composed of 180 articles, up from 108 articles in the earlier version.
With respect to content, the draft text is a distinctively Moroccan constitutional model based on two complementary pillars:
+ The first pillar is the commitment to the Moroccan nation’s immutable values, the preservation and sustainability of which is entrusted to me, within the framework an Islamic country in which the King and Commander of the Faithful ensures the protection of the faith and guarantees the freedom of religious practice.

Enshrined in the draft Constitution are the status of our country as a constituent of the Maghreb, as well as its commitment to building the Maghreb Union, consolidating Arab and Islamic brotherhood as well as African solidarity, expanding and diversifying cooperation and partnership relations with its European and Mediterranean neighbors and with all countries around the world, and confirming Morocco’s status as a modern State committed to UN conventions, and as an active member of the international community.
+ The second pillar confirms the features and mechanisms of the parliamentary nature of the Moroccan political system, which is essentially based on the principles of the nation’s sovereignty, the supremacy of the Constitution as the source of all powers, and the link between public office and accountability, as part of an efficient, rational constitutional system whose core elements are the balance, independence and separation of powers, and whose foremost goal is the freedom and dignity of citizens.
One of the changes that attest to the separation of powers and the clear definition of their prerogatives is the splitting up of current Article 19 in two articles:
+ A separate article concerns the exclusive religious powers of the King, Commander of the Faithful and President of the Higher Ulema Council, an institution which has been elevated to the constitutional rank.
+ Another article specifies the status of the King as Head of State and the country’s Supreme Representative. He is the symbol of nation’s unity and guarantor of its continuity and sustainability, and of the Kingdom’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. The King is trustworthy guide and the supreme arbitrator who is entrusted with the task of safeguarding democratic choices and ensuring the proper functioning of constitutional institutions; he is above all types of affiliation.
The King shall exercise the duties relating to sovereignty, arbitration and the guarantees he provides, and which are mentioned in this article, in accordance with the provisions expressly stipulated in other articles of the Constitution; legislation shall remain the exclusive jurisdiction of the Parliament.
My loyal subjects,
The official constitutional project is more than a foremost legislative text. I consider it to be the bedrock of the special Moroccan democratic development model - a new historical bond between the Throne and the people, as reflected in the following ten basic elements:
+ First: Enshrining in the Constitution the citizenship-based Monarchy and the Citizen King through the following:
+ Specify that the person of the King shall be inviolable, and that respect and reverence shall be due to him as King, Commander of the Faithful and Head of State.
+ Set the legal age for the King at 18, instead of 16, as is the case for his Moroccan brothers and sisters.
+ Entrust the presidency of the Regency Council to the President of the Constitutional Court, given that the latter is the institution in charge of upholding the Constitution. This reinforces the core mission of the Council. All constitutional powers are to be represented in it as a result of adding to its membership the Head of Government and the Deputy Chairman of the Higher Council of the Judicial Branch; similarly, the Ulema’s representation in the Regency Council will be enhanced, since the Secretary-General of the Higher Ulema Council will be a member of the Regency Council.
+ Second: constitutionalizing the Amazigh language as an official language of the Kingdom, alongside Arabic:
Given the cohesion characterizing the various components of our unified, rich and diverse national identity - including the Arabic-Islamic, Berber, Saharan, African, Andalusian, Jewish and Mediterranean components - the draft Constitution confirms the status of Arabic as an official language of the Kingdom, and provides that the State pledges to protect and promote it.
It also provides for constitutionalizing the Amazigh language as an official language as well, within the framework of a pioneering initiative which is the culmination of a course of action to rehabilitate the Amazigh language as a heritage belonging to all Moroccans. The official character of the Amazigh language will be gradually implemented through an organic law, which will specify the ways and means of integrating it in teaching and in basic public sectors.
In parallel, the draft Constitution provides for the promotion of all linguistic and cultural expressions in Morocco, particularly the Hassani culture, which is a characteristic feature of our beloved Saharan provinces.
Consistent with my keen desire to upgrade the skills of our youth and of our human resources - so that they may access the knowledge and globalization-based society, and at the same time have a good command of science and technology -, the draft Constitution mentions the need to learn the world’s foremost international languages, within the framework of a well-thought, coherent strategy that would bolster national unity. This is a task which will be supervised by a higher council whose mission will be to promote the Moroccan culture as well as our national and official languages, and to streamline the action of the institutions concerned, including the body in charge of developing the Arabic language.
+ Third: Enshrining in the Constitution all human rights as they are universally recognized, with the applicable mechanisms and enforcement guarantees. As a result, the Moroccan Constitution will be a human rights Constitution as well as a charter for citizenship rights and obligations.
In this regard, the draft Constitution provides for the pre-eminence of international covenants - as ratified by Morocco - over national legislation, as well as gender equality in civil rights, within the framework of respect for the Constitution, and for the Kingdom’s laws which are derived from Islam. The draft Constitution also provides for equality between men and women in all political, economic, social, cultural and environment-related rights; it sets up a mechanism to promote gender equality.
The draft Constitution confirms the commitment to all human rights, especially the presumption of innocence and guaranteeing the conditions for a fair trial. It criminalizes torture, enforced disappearance, arbitrary detention and all forms of discrimination and inhuman, degrading practices. The draft Constitution also upholds freedom of the press and of expression and opinion, as well as the right to access information and to submit petitions, in accordance with norms and criteria specified in an organic law.
The constitutional guarantees regarding the rights of the working class have been reinforced in order to promote social justice and national solidarity, in addition to freedom of private initiative and the rule of law in the corporate sector.
+ Fourth: An executive branch led by the Head of Government, in accordance with democratic practice:
In this regard, the constitutional status of "the Prime Minister" will be elevated to that of "Head of Government" and of the executive branch; he will be appointed from the party which wins the general elections, thereby confirming that the government will result from direct universal suffrage.

Confirming the full authority of the Head of Government over cabinet members, the Constitution gives the Head of Government the power to propose and dismiss cabinet members, to steer and coordinate government action, and to supervise public service. Thus, the Head of Government has been given appointment powers, via decree, in civilian positions, in accordance with an organic law which will specify the list of these positions as well as the conditions required to hold public office on the basis of merit, transparency and equal opportunity for all Moroccans.
The King, on a proposal by the Head of Government and at the initiative of the ministers concerned, will exercise the power of appointment, at the Council of Ministers, in some senior public positions, such as those of wali, governor, ambassador and the officials in charge of domestic security agencies and strategic national institutions. As for appointments in the military, they remain an exclusive, sovereign prerogative of the King, Supreme Commander and Chief of Staff of the Royal Armed Forces.
The draft Constitution also empowers the Head of Government to dissolve the House of Representatives, and stresses that the King shall consult him before announcing the state of exception or the dissolution of Parliament. It specifies the conditions to be observed in each case in order to ensure the separation of powers as well as balance and cooperation between the branches.
To provide the Government with a constitutional basis for the exercise of its regulatory and executive powers, the Governing Council has been enshrined in the Constitution; its powers have been specified and clarified in coordination with and in light of the powers of the Council of Ministers.
+ The Council of Ministers is held under the chairmanship of the King, at his initiative or at the request of the Head of Government, who participates in its proceedings along with the ministers only. The King may delegate the chairmanship of the Council to the Head of Government, on the basis of a specific agenda, the aim being to enhance the executive authority of the Head of Government. As for the Governing Council, it is chaired by the Head of Government, at his initiative, with the participation of all cabinet members.
+ As regards prerogatives, the Governing Council shall have extensive, specific executive powers, some of which will be of a decision-making nature, and others of a deliberative character; the latter will be referred to the Council of Ministers for decision, as part of the powers retained by the latter in terms of strategy, arbitration and general policy, including the preservation of macro-economic and financial balance, which has now became a constitutional norm.
+ Fifth: A legislative branch which wields strong legislative and regulatory power as well as authority to assess government policy. The draft Constitution asserts the pre-eminence of the House of Representatives, which shall have the final say in the ratification of legislative texts. It will also have greater powers in terms of control over the government, especially as the government will be accountable only to Parliament. The power of legislation and the enactment of all laws will be the exclusive prerogative of Parliament, and the domain of law will therefore increase from 30 fields currently to more than 60 in the proposed Constitution.
To raise moral standards in parliamentary action, the draft Constitution forbids party-switching and restricts parliamentary immunity to the expression of opinion only, to the exclusion of ordinary criminal cases. The draft Constitution also cancels the High Court of Justice for cabinet members, thus confirming the principle of equality of all citizens before the law and the judiciary.
As regards the House of Councilors, and in order to rationalize its composition, the draft Constitution provides that it be made up of 90 to 120 members.
In this regard, and in response to a request submitted by trade unions - and backed by political parties - regarding union representation in the second chamber, I have decided, as part of my arbitration prerogatives, to provide for appropriate representation of trade unions, professional organizations and national employers’ associations. This decision is fully consistent with the very nature of the Moroccan social monarchy, as well as with my system of governance, which places the improvement of the citizens’ social conditions at the heart of my concerns, in both political and practical terms.
With respect to our fellow citizens living abroad, they will be represented in Parliament as soon as a democratic form of representation takes firm shape, knowing that they have the right to vote and to stand as candidates in both Houses.
+ Sixth: Set up a special system and effective mechanisms for parliamentary opposition in order to enhance its status and role in enriching parliamentary action, in terms of both legislation and control. It now has the right to proportional representation in all the bodies and organs of Parliament. The draft Constitution also stipulates that the Head of Government shall make a progress report to Parliament on government action, and answer questions on public policy. Similarly, the draft Constitution lowers the quorum required to move a motion of censure, set up commissions of inquiry and refer bills to the Constitutional Court. Parliamentary committees will have the right to address questions to officials in charge of administrations and public institutions.
+ Seventh: Enhance the status of the judiciary as a branch which is autonomous from the executive and the legislative branches, thus confirming the independence of the judiciary, of which I am the guarantor. The draft Constitution explicitly says that while judgments are pronounced in the name of the King, they must be consistent with the law. To preserve the inviolability of the judiciary, the draft Constitution criminalizes any interference, corruption or influence peddling with regard to the judiciary.
Similarly, the draft Constitution sets up the "Higher Council of the Judicial Branch", as a constitutional institution headed by the King, in replacement of the Higher Council of the Judiciary, with a view to giving administrative and financial autonomy to the new Higher Council. It also makes the President of the Court of Cassation Executive President of the Council - instead of the Minister of Justice in the current Constitution - the aim being to bolster the separation of powers.
Similarly, the composition of the new Council has been enhanced by increasing the number of elected representatives of judges, as well as the representation of women judges, making sure Council membership is open to personalities and institutions operating in the area of human rights and the defense of judicial independence.
Council powers have also been expanded to include, in addition to the judges’ career issues, the functions of inspection as well as the expression of opinions on legislative and regulatory texts relating to the judiciary, and assessment of the judicial system.
To confirm the principle of the supremacy of the Constitution and the law, the Constitutional Council has been elevated to the rank of a "Constitutional Court" with extensive powers which, in addition to existing prerogatives, include checking the constitutionality of international conventions and ruling on disputes between the State and the regions. In order to promote democratic citizenship, this Court has been authorized to look into litigants’ claims regarding the unconstitutionality of a law which the Judiciary may deem detrimental to constitutional rights and freedoms.
Eighth: Constitutionalizing certain key institutions, while leaving the door open for the establishment - through legislative or regulatory texts - of other mechanisms and institutions in order to promote citizenship and democratic participation:
Thus, several institutions have been enshrined in the Constitution, such as the Al-Wasseet Institution (Ombudsman), the Council of the Moroccan Community Abroad, and the High Authority for Audiovisual Communication. Similarly, the powers of the Economic and Social Council have been expanded to cover environmental issues, and those of the Higher Council for Education have been increased to include training and scientific research.
Also enshrined in the proposed Constitution is the National Council for Human Rights. Moreover, the constitutional status of political parties, trade unions, professional organizations and civil society groups has been enhanced through the allocation of several articles to each category.
To give young people an institutional forum for expression and debate, I was keen to set up a Council for Youth and Community Work as an institution with a proactive role designed to enable young people to contribute to building a nation based on unity, dignity and social justice, in keeping with the principles of democracy and responsible citizenship.
+ Ninth: Strengthen the mechanisms of good governance, integrity in the public sector, and the fight against corruption, through the establishment of a coherent, full-fledged national institutional system. To this end, the role of the Court of Auditors and of the Regional Courts of Auditors will be reinforced in terms of control of public money and enforcement of the principles of transparency, responsibility, accountability and prevention of impunity. The Competitiveness Council and the National Authority for integrity and the prevention and fight against corruption will be enshrined in the Constitution.
As security, in the strategic acceptation of the term, has become a global challenge, I was keen to provide our country with an advisory institutional mechanism in the form of a Supreme Security Council which will convene under my chairmanship. I may delegate the Council’s chairmanship to the Head of Government, on the basis of a duly specified agenda. The heads of the legislative, executive and judicial branches as well as the ministers, officials and personalities concerned will be members of the Council. The Security Council will be in charge of the management of internal and external strategic security issues, as well as structural and emergency matters. It will serve as a proactive instrument to ensure good security governance.
My loyal subjects,
Our overall perception of genuine democracy and good governance does not stop at a mere redistribution of central powers; rather, it is based on a distribution of powers and resources between the central authority and the regions, within the framework of an advanced regionalization system which I consider to be the pillar of the extensive reform and modernization of state institutions.
The tenth basic element falls within the framework of this vision. It concerns the enshrining, in the Constitution, of our country as a unifier of regions; a country based on a democratic, highly decentralized system, which seeks to achieve integrated human and sustainable development, within the framework of the State’s national unity and its territorial integrity, and in keeping with the principles of balance and national and regional solidarity.
To highlight this strategic choice in the draft Constitution, a chapter has been devoted to local governments and advanced regionalization, in light of the frame of reference I set out in my historic address on 9th March 2011. An organic law will define the powers of the State and of regions, in addition to the resources, organization and mechanisms of regionalization.
My loyal subjects,
As perfect as it may be, a constitution is never an end in itself, but rather a means for the establishment of democratic institutions. The latter require reforms and political overhauling in which all stakeholders should take part, so as to achieve our shared ambition, namely to promote development and enable all our citizens to lead a dignified life.

In this sense, when the nation’s First Servant accomplishes his civic duty, and votes “Yes” to the draft Constitution which will be submitted to the people via referendum, it is because of a firm conviction that this draft Constitution duly takes into account the democratic principles, development-oriented institutions and mechanisms of good governance required; and because it safeguards the rights and dignity of all Moroccans, in keeping with the principles of equality and the rule of law.
I shall vote “Yes” because I am convinced that the draft Constitution’s democratic essence will provide a strong impetus for the final settlement of the just cause of the Moroccan Sahara, on the basis of our Autonomy Initiative. It will also enhance Morocco’s regional leadership as a State with a truly distinctive, unity-based democratic approach.
I therefore call on political parties, trade unions and civil society organizations, which participated freely, from beginning to end, and with a keen sense of commitment, in developing this draft Constitution, to seek to mobilize the Moroccan people, not only for the purpose of voting the draft Constitution, but also to see to it that it is implemented. Indeed, it constitutes the best means for the accomplishment of the legitimate aspirations of our responsible, vigilant young people, and of all Moroccans, who aspire to achieve our shared ambition of building our nation of the solid foundation of tranquility, unity, stability, democracy, development, prosperity, justice, dignity, the rule of law and the institutions-based State.
I shall be at the forefront, seeking an optimal implementation of this sophisticated constitutional project which strengthens the foundations of a constitutional, democratic, parliamentary and social monarchy, once the draft Constitution has, by the Grace of the Almighty, been approved by referendum, next July 1st.
“Say: ‘This is my way: I do invite unto Allah,- on evidence clear as the seeing with one's eyes,- I and whoever follows me’.”
The Word of God is Truth.
Wassalamu alaikum warahmatullah wabarakatuh"

          Source : ATFWS

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Why Morocco matters

Pundits do not, as a rule, make good prophets, but that does not stop them from aligning themselves with various scenarios of what will happen in the Arab world in the wake of the regime change in Tunisia. While Egypt followed Tunisia with its own serious domestic uprisings calling for changing the government, and Yemen may well face the same challenge, a broad brush approach is hardly useful in defining what US policy options are or ought to be.
Morocco is a case in point. It is a strong monarchy with a representative Parliament, and its King enjoys a unique religious and political leadership status with his people. It is a country that has moved away from authoritarian behavior and invested in institutional change that is opening political space for its citizens and responsible opposition to critique government policies, exercise individual freedoms, and seek opportunities from a market-centered economy.
Morocco is not Tunisia or Egypt or Yemen. It has steadily and coherently worked to enlarge opportunities for its people and reduce conditions that undermine stability – whether through programs to reduce poverty and its drag on economic and social development, or to empower women and to encourage youth to take greater ownership of their future. This solid record of accomplishments has been referred to as the “Moroccan exception.”
A great deal of real and tangible progress has been made in Morocco to allow for popular expression through a flourishing civil society and free elections. Current efforts to address the needs of the poor through projects like the National Human Development Initiative and affordable housing programs continue to contribute to raising the standard of living of the most disadvantaged sectors of society. And while much more remains to be accomplished to advance further political reforms, the King's latest effort to undertake a thorough overhaul of the judiciary to ensure its independence is yet another progressive step forward that distinguishes Morocco from other countries in the Middle East and North Africa where regimes have been slow to rebuild a positive relationship between the State and the people.
Some analysts lately have pointed out that the King of Morocco enjoys popular legitimacy and support in the country by virtue of his role as the Kingdom's religious leader and his responsibilities as Commander of the Faithful. While this is true, it is not the whole truth. In fact, the King’s legitimacy in Morocco is, as importantly if not largely, the result of his efforts to redefine the citizen-State relationship through the kind of steady reforms that are lacking elsewhere in this region. Morocco has never held itself out as a model for others and has not undertaken these reforms in order to offer anyone any lessons. Reforms in Morocco are Moroccan inspired and have been the product of a consensus between the monarchy, political parties, civil society, and the people themselves through a process of dialogue and public debate.
While Morocco’s experience and the specifics of its ongoing process of liberalization may not be possible for other societies in the MENA region, there are certainly some lessons to be learned here. The international community, particularly the United States, should note that long term peace, prosperity, and stability in the Middle East and North Africa will require encouraging the kinds of reforms that Morocco has been implementing for more than a decade. Morocco didn’t wait for a crisis to begin its progressive policies. Morocco confronted similar challenges by making choices that promote both stability and democracy. Those who wish to promote peace, freedom, growth, and prosperity in the region would do well to recognize and provide meaningful support to those already on the right road and seek their quiet advice and counsel on how best to help those who are struggling to move forward without destabilizing their countries.

By Edward M. Gabriel served as U.S. Ambassador to Morocco from 1997 to 2001, and currently advises the government of Morocco.

Monday, January 3, 2011

Congressman Lincoln Diaz-Balart Speech on the Western Sahara and Morocco

Staging a Human Rights Atrocity

By JENNIFER RUBIN - 11.23.2010 - 5:25 PM
It has become a familiar pattern: violent provocateurs create a confrontation with lightly armed anti-riot squads. The state officials defend themselves. The instigators claim there has been an atrocity. The flotilla incident? Why, yes. But also a recent confrontation between Morocco and the violent Polisario Front, which refuses to accept a Moroccan autonomy plan for the Western Sahara and keeps refugees warehoused in dismal camps in Algeria.
As the Israeli government did in the flotilla incident, the government of Morocco has put out a video of a recent incident in Laayoune. This video, which is exceptionally graphic but should be reviewed in full to appreciate the extent of the Polisario Front’s propaganda campaign, shows peaceful demonstrators in a tent city (who came to protest overcrowding, totally unrelated to the dispute in the Western Sahara) dispersed without incident by Moroccan police, loaded onto government-provided buses, and exiting the area. Then onto the scene come the Polisario Front, with knives, rock-throwers, incendiary devices, and much brutality. What unfolds — vicious attacks on the police, the ambush of an ambulance, buildings burning in the city center, a near beheading of a policeman, etc. — is evidence that the Polisario Front is the aggressor in this incident.
And yet the Polisario Front, with a willing media, played the incident up as a human rights violation — by the government of Morocco. This report duly regurgitates the Polisario Front’s claim that the Moroccan government was guilty “of carrying out ‘ethnic cleansing’ in Laayoune and warned the international community that if it did not intervene to find a peaceful solution, ‘the Sahrawi people will resort to all measures, including war.’” This AP report tells us: “Moroccan forces raided a protest camp in the disputed territory of Western Sahara on Monday and unrest spread to a nearby city, with buildings ablaze and rioters roaming the streets. Five Moroccan security officials and one demonstrator were killed, reports said.” One would think that the government’s forces instigated the violence with the peaceful protesters there, and it would be hard to glean — as the video shows — that the protest camp had been dismantled before the Polisario Front forces attacked the police.
So what is going on here? Well, it seems that the incident came just as there was to begin the “re-opening of informal U.N.-sponsored talks Monday in Manhasset, New York, between Morocco and the Polisario Front, which long waged a guerrilla war on Morocco in a bid to gain independence for the desert region and its native Saharawi people.” Hmm. Sort of like the killing of Jews that inevitably breaks out when “peace” talks begin between Israel and the PA.
Whether the group is the PA or the Polisario Front, the modus operandi is the same — stage violence, claim victimhood, label the incident as a human rights atrocity, and thereby delay or disrupt peace negotiations that might resolve the conflict and leave the terrorists without a cause. You would think the media would be on to it. Unless, of course, they really don’t care about getting the story straight.

Moroccan parliament to probe W. Sahara violence

RABAT — Moroccan members of parliament on Monday decided to set up a commission to probe the violent events on November 8 that marked the dismantling of a settlement camp in the Western Sahara.
"It's the first time that a parliamentary commission of inquiry will work in the (Western) Sahara," Saad-Eddine Othmani, an MP from the opposition Justice and Development Party (PJD) and one of the vice-presidents of the commission, told AFP.
According to a statement published Monday by the parliament, the commission will investigate "the events at the Gdim Izik camp and the acts of violence recently witnessed in Laayoune," the chief town in the Moroccan-controlled territory.
Moroccan security forces on November 8 stormed and dismantled the Gdim Izik camp erected outside Laayoune by some 15,000 Sahrawis who objected to living conditions inside the town.
Violence erupted, in which Morocco says that 11 security officers and two civilians were killed, while the Polisario Front, which wants independence for the Western Sahara, says the casualty toll was far higher.
"Among the objectives of this commission, which will work for at least 45 days, are the pinpointing of responsibilities for what happened in Laayoune, from the putting up of the first tents right up to the events that followed the dismantling of the camp," Othmani said.
On November 25, the European parliament said it favoured a United Nations inquiry into the violence and voiced "the greatest concern about the significant deterioration of the situation in Western Sahara."
Tens of thousands of Moroccans marched Sunday in the northern port city of Casablanca to denounce what they saw as a "biased and unjust" resolution by the European parliament, accusing Spain's opposition Popular Party of being behind it.
Spain was the colonial power in the Western Sahara until 1975, when settlers left and Morocco later annexed the phosphate-rich territory.
Morocco has already rejected the notion of an investigation into the violence by the UN force deployed in the Western Sahara, MINURSO, which is monitoring a 1991 ceasefire between government troops and the Polisario Front and is mandated to oversee a referendum on the territory's future.
Polisario, backed notably by neighbouring Algeria, wants a UN-organised referendum that would give Sahrawis a choice among three options: being part of Moroccan territory, independence or self-government under Moroccan sovereignty.
Morocco will only agree to broad autonomy under its sovereignty and rejects any notion of independence.

Moroccan parliament to probe W. Sahara violence

RABAT — Moroccan members of parliament on Monday decided to set up a commission to probe the violent events on November 8 that marked the dismantling of a settlement camp in the Western Sahara.
"It's the first time that a parliamentary commission of inquiry will work in the (Western) Sahara," Saad-Eddine Othmani, an MP from the opposition Justice and Development Party (PJD) and one of the vice-presidents of the commission, told AFP.
According to a statement published Monday by the parliament, the commission will investigate "the events at the Gdim Izik camp and the acts of violence recently witnessed in Laayoune," the chief town in the Moroccan-controlled territory.
Moroccan security forces on November 8 stormed and dismantled the Gdim Izik camp erected outside Laayoune by some 15,000 Sahrawis who objected to living conditions inside the town.
Violence erupted, in which Morocco says that 11 security officers and two civilians were killed, while the Polisario Front, which wants independence for the Western Sahara, says the casualty toll was far higher.
"Among the objectives of this commission, which will work for at least 45 days, are the pinpointing of responsibilities for what happened in Laayoune, from the putting up of the first tents right up to the events that followed the dismantling of the camp," Othmani said.
On November 25, the European parliament said it favoured a United Nations inquiry into the violence and voiced "the greatest concern about the significant deterioration of the situation in Western Sahara."
Tens of thousands of Moroccans marched Sunday in the northern port city of Casablanca to denounce what they saw as a "biased and unjust" resolution by the European parliament, accusing Spain's opposition Popular Party of being behind it.
Spain was the colonial power in the Western Sahara until 1975, when settlers left and Morocco later annexed the phosphate-rich territory.
Morocco has already rejected the notion of an investigation into the violence by the UN force deployed in the Western Sahara, MINURSO, which is monitoring a 1991 ceasefire between government troops and the Polisario Front and is mandated to oversee a referendum on the territory's future.
Polisario, backed notably by neighbouring Algeria, wants a UN-organised referendum that would give Sahrawis a choice among three options: being part of Moroccan territory, independence or self-government under Moroccan sovereignty.
Morocco will only agree to broad autonomy under its sovereignty and rejects any notion of independence.